Chapala Mohanty vs. CT And GST Officer,Koraput

WP(C)/30536/2021HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01065692202125 October 2021Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY2 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court condoned the delay in the petitioner's application for revocation of cancellation of GST registration, invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules. The Court directed that the petitioner must deposit all taxes, interest, late fee, and penalty due, and comply with other formalities. Upon fulfillment of these conditions, the petitioner's application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law. The Court further directed that a certified copy of the order be produced before the proper officer, who will then open the portal to enable the petitioner to file the GST return, subject to the petitioner complying with the aforementioned conditions. The writ petition was disposed of in these terms.

Facts

The petitioner, Chapala Mohanty, filed a writ petition before the Orissa High Court challenging an action or order by the CT & GST Officer, Koraput Circle, Koraput. The specific tax period is not mentioned. The core issue revolves around the petitioner's delay in filing a revocation application under the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules. The petitioner sought condonation of this delay. The Opposite Parties, represented by the Additional Standing Counsel, stated that if the delay is condoned and the petitioner pays all taxes, interest, late fee, and penalty, the 3B Return Form will be accepted.

Key Issues

1. Whether the delay in filing the application for revocation of cancellation of GST registration, invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules, should be condoned? The Petitioner argued for condonation of delay, implying that procedural technicalities should not prevent compliance and business operations. The Revenue (Opposite Parties) conceded to condoning the delay, provided the Petitioner fulfills all financial obligations and other formalities as stipulated by the GST law. The issue hinges on the interpretation and application of the proviso to Rule 23, which allows for revocation of cancellation under certain conditions, including payment of dues.

Sections Cited

Rule 23

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.30536 of 2021 Chapala Mohanty …. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Harichandan, Advocate -versus- CT & GST Officer, Koraput Circle, Koraput and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.S. Padhy, A.S.C. CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY Order No.

ORDER

25.10.

2021

01.

1. Mr. Padhy, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the Opposite Parties appearing on an advance notice states that as long as delay in filing the revocation application is condoned, and provided the Petitioner complies with all the requirements of paying the taxes, interest, late fee and penalty due, the 3B Return Form filed by the Petitioner will be accepted by the Opposite Parties.

2.

In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes,

//

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.