Chandra Sekhar Jena vs. State Of Odisha

WP(C)/23551/2021HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01050935202124 November 2021Bench: MR. JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH,MR. JUSTICE C.R.DASH6 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court did not decide the core issue of entitlement to reimbursement directly but disposed of the writ petition by directing the Petitioner to make a comprehensive representation to the appropriate authority within four weeks. The Court mandated that the authority must consider and dispose of this representation in light of the revised guidelines issued by the Finance Department, Government of Odisha, on December 10, 2018. The authority is to act expeditiously, preferably within three months from the receipt of the certified copy of the order. The Petitioner retains the right to challenge the authority's decision if aggrieved. No coercive action is to be taken against the Petitioner until a decision is reached by the authority. The Court noted that the matter was identical to a previous writ petition, W.P.(C) No.5933 of 2020, and was disposed of in terms of the order passed in that case.

Facts

The Petitioner, Chandra Sekhar Jena, challenged the action of the Opposite Parties (State of Odisha and Ors.) for not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising from the transition from Value Added Tax (VAT) to Goods and Services Tax (GST) effective July 1, 2017. The Petitioner's grievance stemmed from the requirement to pay GST on works contracts, which was not anticipated when agreements were entered into under the previous tax regime. The State had issued revised guidelines on December 10, 2018, superseding earlier guidelines from December 7, 2017, to address difficulties faced by contractors regarding works contracts under GST.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to reimbursement of differential tax amounts due to the change in tax regime from VAT to GST for works contracts executed partly or wholly after July 1, 2017, when tenders were invited prior to this date. The Petitioner argued that the introduction of GST imposed a tax liability not envisaged at the time of entering into agreements, leading to a financial burden. The State, through its revised guidelines dated December 10, 2018, provided a mechanism for determining the additional amount payable to works contractors. These guidelines addressed how to calculate the GST-inclusive work value for the balance work executed after July 1, 2017, based on revised Schedule of Rates (SoR-2014) and tender premium/discount, and stipulated reimbursement if the revised value exceeded the original agreement value.

Sections Cited

Not specified in the judgment

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.23551 of 2021 Chandra Sekhar Jena …… Petitioner Mr. S. Padhee, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Ors. …… Opposite Parties Mr. P.P. Mohanty, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE C.R. DASH JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH

ORDER 24.11.2021 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr. S. Padhee, learned counsel for the petitioner and P.P. Mohanty, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State-Opposite Parties.

3.

It is submitted at the Bar that, the present writ petition being identical to W.P.(C) No.5933 of 2020, the same may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 18th February, 2020 passed in W.P.(C) No.5933 of 2020. 4. By way of this writ petition, the Petitioner has challenged the action of the Opposite Parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising out of change

2

in tax regime from Value Added Tax (VAT) to Goods and Service Tax (GST) with effect from 1st July, 2017. 5. Batch of writ petitions are being filed on

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.