Kedar Nayak vs. The Commnr., CT And GST, Odisha
Held
The Court condoned the delay in the Petitioner's application for revocation of cancellation of GST registration under the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules. The Court directed that upon the Petitioner depositing all due taxes, interest, penalty, and late fee, and complying with other formalities, their application for revocation would be considered in accordance with the law. The Petitioner was instructed to produce a downloaded copy of the order before the proper officer. Subject to compliance with the conditions, the proper officer was directed to open the portal to enable the Petitioner to file the GST return. The Court also noted that if any appeal had been filed in the interim, it would be rendered infructuous by this order, and the Petitioner was to inform the Appellate Authority accordingly. The writ petition was disposed of on these terms.
Facts
The Petitioner, Kedar Nayak, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack challenging an action by the Opposite Parties, including the Commissioner, CT and GST, Odisha. The core issue revolved around the Petitioner's delay in filing a revocation application under the Odisha Goods and Services Tax (OGST) Rules. The Petitioner sought to file their 3B Return Form, which was apparently not accepted due to this delay. The tax period and the specific amount in dispute are not explicitly stated in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the writ petition is not detailed, other than the Petitioner's attempt to invoke the proviso to Rule 23 of the OGST Rules.
Key Issues
1. Whether the delay in filing the application for revocation of cancellation of GST registration, under the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules, should be condoned? The Petitioner contended that the delay should be condoned to allow them to file their 3B Return Form. The Revenue, represented by the Additional Standing Counsel, stated that as long as the delay is condoned and the Petitioner complies with all requirements, including payment of taxes, interest, penalty, and late fee, the 3B Return Form will be accepted. The Revenue did not present any arguments against condonation, provided the conditions were met.
Sections Cited
Rule 23
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 02.12.2021
1. Mr. Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel for Opposite Parties appearing on an advance notice states that as long as delay in filing the revocation application is condoned, and provided the Petitioner complies with all the requirements of paying the taxes, interest, penalty and late fee, as may be due, the 3B Return Form filed by the Petitioner will be accepted by the Opposite Parties.
In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, penalty and late fee as may be due and complying
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.