M/S Mangalam Timber Products LTD. vs. The Commissioner Of Odisha Goods And Service Tax
Held
The Court held that the levy of interest in terms of the impugned order dated February 14, 2020, has been rendered unsustainable in law due to the amendment to the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, by the Finance Act, 2021. The reasoning was based on the undisputed fact that the amendment made the levy unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned notice on demand and recovery dated February 14, 2020, was set aside. The matter was remanded to the Joint Commissioner of State Tax and GST, Bhubaneswar-IV Circle, for a fresh order in light of the aforementioned amendment. No specific amount in dispute was mentioned.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s. Mangalam Timber Products Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack challenging a notice on demand and recovery dated February 14, 2020, issued by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax and GST, Bhubaneswar-IV Circle. The notice pertained to the levy of interest. The Opposite Parties were the Commissioner of Odisha Goods and Service Tax and Others. The court noted that an amendment to the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, by the Finance Act, 2021, rendered the levy of interest in the impugned order unsustainable in law.
Key Issues
1. Whether the levy of interest in terms of the impugned notice on demand and recovery dated February 14, 2020, is sustainable in law, considering the amendment to the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, by the Finance Act, 2021? The Petitioner contended that the amendment to the CGST Act, 2017, by the Finance Act, 2021, has rendered the levy of interest unsustainable. The Revenue did not dispute this contention, as indicated by the court's observation that it was not in dispute. No specific arguments were recorded for the Revenue beyond their acceptance of notice.
Sections Cited
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Finance Act, 2021
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 22.12.2021 03. 1. Mr. Sunil Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of Opposite Party Nos.1 and 2 and Choudhury Satyajit Mishra, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Opposite Party Nos.3 and 4. 2. It is not in dispute that by virtue of amendment to the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by the Finance Act, 2021 the levy of interest in terms of the impugned order 14th February, 2020 has been rendered unsustainable in law.
In that view of the matter, the impugned notice on demand and recovery dated 14th February, 2020 is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded to the Joint Commissioner of
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.