Gajendra Prasad Panda vs. State Of Odisha

WP(C)/38934/2021HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01084364202131 January 2022Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Gajendra Prasad Panda, filed a writ petition before the Orissa High Court challenging an unspecified order or action by the State of Odisha and other opposite parties. The tax period and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the writ petition is also not detailed. The matter was taken up for hearing via video conferencing.

Held

The Court held that the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition should be granted. The Court reasoned that the petitioner sought liberty to pursue other appropriate remedies available in accordance with law, and there was no objection from the opposite parties. Therefore, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. The Court did not delve into the substantive merits of the case or any GST-related issues, as the disposal was based on the petitioner's request for withdrawal.

Key Issues

The Court had to decide whether to allow the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner argued for withdrawal with liberty to pursue other remedies. The opposite parties, the State of Odisha and others (represented by CT and GST Deptt.), did not appear to contest the withdrawal. No specific GST provisions were discussed in relation to the issues raised by the petitioner, as the case was disposed of on a procedural request.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.38934 of 2021 Gajendra Prasad Panda …. Petitioner Mr. J. K. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- State of odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. P. K. Muduli, AGA and Mr. Sunil Mishra, ASC for CT and GST Deptt. CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK Order No.

ORDER 31.01.2022

01.

1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to seek other appropriate remedies as may be available to the Petitioner in accordance with law.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

4.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020, modified by Notice No.4798, dated 15th

April, 2021, and Court’

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.