M/S. Penguin Trading And Agencies LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA

WP(C)/27684/2021HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01059671202131 January 2022Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Penguin Trading & Agencies Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The Opposite Parties were the Union of India and others. The specific tax period(s) and the order or action under challenge, as well as the authority that passed it, are not detailed in the judgment. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history leading to the writ petition is not provided. The matter was taken up by video conferencing.

Held

The Court held that the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition should be granted. The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to raise all points at the appropriate stage if the order in appeal is adverse to the petitioner. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's explicit request. The ratio decidendi is that a party can withdraw a writ petition with liberty to pursue remedies later, provided the court grants such liberty. The operative direction was to dispose of the writ petition as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

Key Issues

The Court had to decide whether to allow the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner argued that they should be granted leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to raise all points at the appropriate stage if the order in appeal is adverse to them. The revenue or State did not record any specific arguments against this request in the judgment. The core issue was the petitioner's right to withdraw their case with a reservation for future action.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.27684 of 2021 M/s. Penguin Trading & Agencies Ltd., Keonjhar …. Petitioner Mr. K. Kurmy, Advocate -versus- Union of India and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. P. K. Parhi, ASGI and Mr. C. S. Mishra, Senior Standing Counsel GST CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK Order No.

ORDER 31.01.2022

01.

1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to raise all the points at the appropriate stage if the order in appeal is adverse to the Petitioner.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

4.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020, modified by Notice No.4798, dated 15th

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.