M/S The National Small Industries Corp. LTD. vs. Commnr., Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha

WP(C)/3920/2022HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01008815202209 November 2022Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The Petitioner, M/s. The National Small Industries Corporation Limited, Bhubaneswar, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The petition challenged an order dated 30th March, 2021, issued by the CT & GST Officer, Cuttack I (Opposite Party No.3). The Petitioner also challenged a consequential demand notice. The Opposite Parties were the Commissioner, Commercial Tax & GST, Odisha, and others. The Court noted that the impugned order was appealable.

Held

The Court held that the order dated 30th March, 2021, issued by the CT & GST Officer, Cuttack I, was clearly appealable. Consequently, the Court saw no reason to interfere with the order through a writ petition. Regarding the consequential demand notice, the Court found that challenging it without challenging the impugned order itself was not permissible. Therefore, the Court declined to interfere in the present petition, leaving it open for the Petitioner to avail the statutory remedy of appeal in accordance with law. The ratio decidendi is that writ jurisdiction should not be exercised when an equally efficacious alternative remedy, such as an appeal, is available to the petitioner.

Key Issues

1. Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition challenging an order that is clearly appealable under the statute? Petitioner's Contention: The Petitioner sought to challenge an order and a consequential demand notice through a writ petition. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue, represented by the Additional Standing Counsel, did not explicitly record arguments in the judgment. However, the Court's reasoning implies that the statutory remedy of appeal was available and should be pursued.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 3920 of 2022 M/s. The National Small Industries Corporation Limited, Bhubaneswar …. Petitioner Mr. R. C. Jena, Advocate -versus- The Commissioner, Commercial Tax & GST, Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Sunil Kumar Mishra, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN Order No.

ORDER 09.11.2022 01. 1. There are two prayers in the present petition. One is a challenge to an order dated 30th March, 2021 issued by Opposite Party No.3 i.e. CT & GST Officer, Cuttack I. The order is clearly an appealable one and the Court therefore sees no reason why it should interfere with it.

2.

As far as the consequential demand notice is concerned, without challenging the impugned order, the question of challenging only the demand notice does not arise.

3.

Consequently, leaving it open to the Petitioner to avail of the statutory remedy available to the Petitioner in accordance with law, the Court declines to interfere in the present petition and it is disposed of as such.

(Dr. S. Mu

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.