M/S.Deo Ispat Alloys LTD. vs. Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes,Odisha

WP(C)/12346/2015HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01027094201514 November 2022Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioners, M/s. Deo Ispat Alloys Ltd. & Another, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The petition was against the Commissioner of Commercial Tax & Others. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge, as well as the authority that passed it, are not detailed in the provided text. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history relevant to the core dispute is not elaborated upon.

Held

The Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition. The liberty was granted to file an appeal as provided in the statute. The appellate authority was directed to consider the application for condonation of delay, if filed by December 19, 2022, citing the pendency of the writ petition as the reason for the delay. The Court explicitly stated that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The original Annexure-1 was to be returned, subject to substitution with an attested photocopy.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether the petitioners should be allowed to withdraw their writ petition. The petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail the statutory remedy of appeal. The revenue or state's contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The Court had to decide on the terms and conditions under which such withdrawal and liberty to appeal would be granted, considering the pendency of the writ petition.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 12346 of 2015 M/s. Deo Ispat Alloys Ltd. &Another …. Petitioners Mr. Sidharth Ray, Advocate -versus- Commissioner of Commercial Tax & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Sunil Mishra, Addl. Standing Counsel for CT & GST Organisation CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN Order No.

ORDER 14.11.2022 03. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail the remedy with an appeal as provided in the statute in accordance with law. If such an appeal is filed not later than 19th December, 2022 accompanied with an application for condonation of delay citing the pendency of the writ petition as the reason for delay, the appellate authority will consider the application on its merit. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion in the matter. Annexure-1 be returned subject to being substituted with the attested photocopy thereof.

2.

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for with the above terms.

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.