State Of Odisha vs. M/S.Vidyarthi

STREV/110/2013HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01005292201319 December 2022Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack, in its order dated December 19, 2022, disposed of the Sales Tax Revision (STREV) No. 110 of 2013. The Court noted that the tax amount involved was insignificant. Consequently, the Court decided not to entertain the revision petition. The Court explicitly stated that the questions of law that were urged in the revision petition are left open for consideration in some other appropriate case. No specific findings were made on any legal issues, and no operative directions were issued beyond disposing of the petition.

Facts

The State of Odisha, as the petitioner, filed a Sales Tax Revision (STREV) No. 110 of 2013 before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The opposite party was M/s. Vidyarthi. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute were not explicitly detailed in the provided order. The procedural history leading to this revision petition before the High Court is not elaborated upon, other than the filing of the petition itself.

Key Issues

The Court was presented with a revision petition filed by the State of Odisha. However, the judgment does not explicitly frame specific questions of law that the Court had to decide. The petitioner (State of Odisha) likely sought to challenge a prior order or decision related to sales tax. The revenue's contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The judgment states that the tax amount being insignificant, the Court does not consider it appropriate to entertain the present revision petition, and the questions of law urged are left open for consideration in some other appropriate case.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK STREV No.110 of 2013 State of Odisha …. Petitioner Mr. Sunil Mishra, ASC for CT & GST Organization -versus- M/s. Vidyarthi …. Opposite Party Mr. Kshirod Kumar Sahoo, Advocate CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN Order No.

ORDER 19.12.2022

03.

1. Mr. Kshirod Kumar Sahoo, learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party files his memo of appearance in Court today. The same be kept on record.

2.

The tax amount being insignificant, the Court does not consider it appropriate to entertain the present revision petition. The questions of law urged in this revision petition, are left open for consideration in some other appropriate case.

3.

Accordingly, the STREV is disposed of.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice

(M. S. Raman)

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.