M/S Shree Bharat Motors LTD.,Khurda vs. The Union Of INDIA
Facts
The petitioner, M/s. Shree Bharat Motors Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking permission to file a revised TRAN-1 form, either electronically or manually, attributing the delay to the Covid-19 pandemic. The impugned order was a letter dated 3rd June 2020 from the Joint Commissioner of CT & GST (IT), and the decision of the High Level Committee (IT-GRC) was also under challenge. The core of the dispute revolved around the petitioner's inability to file the transitional credit forms within the stipulated time due to pandemic-related disruptions.
Held
The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned letter dated 3rd June 2020 of the Joint Commissioner of CT & GST (IT) and the decision of the High Level Committee (IT-GRC). Following the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd., the Court directed the Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) to open a common portal for filing TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms for availing transitional credit for a period of two months, from September 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022. The Court further directed that any aggrieved registered assessee, irrespective of whether they had filed a writ petition or had their case decided by the ITGRC, could file or revise their forms. GSTN was mandated to ensure no technical glitches during this period. Concerned officers were granted 90 days thereafter to verify the claims and pass orders on merits after affording an opportunity to the parties. Allowed transitional credit would then be reflected in the Electronic Credit Ledger. The Court also suggested that the GST Council may issue guidelines for scrutinizing such claims.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to file the revised TRAN-1 form, either electronically or manually, on account of delays caused by the Covid-19 pandemic? The petitioner argued that the delay in filing the TRAN-1 form was directly attributable to the unprecedented circumstances arising from the Covid-19 pandemic, hindering their ability to comply with the statutory timelines. The revenue's arguments are not explicitly recorded in the judgment. The court considered the Supreme Court's judgment in Union of India v. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. (2022 LiveLaw (SC) 628) and various High Court judgments dealing with similar situations arising from the pandemic.
Sections Cited
TRAN-1, TRAN-2
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 17.01.2023 Order No.
1. The short prayer in the present writ petition is that the Petitioner should be permitted to file the revised TRAN-1 either electronically or manually since the delay in filing it earlier was on account of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Following the judgment of the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 628, this Court sets aside the impugned letter dated 3rd June 2020 of the Joint Commissioner of CT & GST (IT) as well the decision of the High Level Committee (IT-GRC) and issues the following directions:
(i)
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.