M/S Trijal Enterprise PVT. Lt.D. vs. Commnr. Of CT And GST, Cuttack

WP(C)/4668/2022HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01010852202202 February 2023Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Trijal Enterprise Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The Opposite Parties were the Commissioner of CT & GST, Cuttack, and others. The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. The impugned demand, which was the subject of the writ petition, is not detailed in terms of amount or specific tax period. The procedural history leading to the writ petition is not elaborated.

Held

The Court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal against the impugned demand before the Appellate Authority. The Court directed that if such an appeal is filed by April 3, 2023, accompanied by an application for condonation of delay citing the pendency of the writ petition as the reason for the delay, the Appellate Authority shall consider it in accordance with law. The Court explicitly stated that it had not expressed any view on the merits of the case. The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty granted.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be granted leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned demand by way of an appeal as provided in law? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition to pursue an appeal against the impugned demand. Revenue's Argument: No specific argument is recorded for the revenue or state in the provided judgment excerpt. The court's order suggests a procedural path for the petitioner rather than a contest on merits.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.4668 of 2022 M/s. Trijal Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. …. Petitioner Mr. C. Das, Advocate -versus- The Commissioner of CT & GST, Cuttack and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Radheyshayam Chimanka, Senior Standing Counsel along with Mr. A. Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel and Mr. S. K. Pradhan, ASC for Revenue Departments CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN

ORDER 02.02.2023 Order No.

02.

1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned demand by way of an appeal as provided in law.

2.

If such an appeal is filed not later than 3rd April, 2023 accompanied by an application for condonation of delay citing the pendency of the present writ petition as the reason for the delay, it will be considered in accordance with law by the Appellate Authority. The Court clarifies that it has not expressed any view on merits.

3.

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the libe

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.