Mohammed Fahim vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha

WP(C)/5034/2020HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01010532202022 February 2023Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN2 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Mohammed Fahim, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The respondents were the Commissioner of CT and GST, Odisha, and another authority. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge, as well as the amount in dispute, are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the writ petition is also not detailed.

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The Court explicitly stated that the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal in accordance with law. The Court further clarified that if such an appeal is filed by April 10, 2023, accompanied by an application for condonation of delay citing the pendency of the writ petition as a reason for the delay, it would be considered by the Appellate Authority. The Court emphasized that it had not expressed any view on the merits of the case. Additionally, the Court permitted the petitioner to request the Appellate Authority for a direction regarding the release of documents by the Enforcement Directorate for the purpose of pursuing the appeal.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether to grant the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal in accordance with law. The Court had to decide whether to permit this withdrawal and grant the requested liberty, considering the implications for the petitioner's ability to pursue their grievance through the appellate channel. The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the revenue or state, other than their presence as opposite parties.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 5034 of 2020 M/s. Mohammed Fahim …. Petitioner Mr. R.P. Kar, Advocate -versus- The Commissioner of CT and GST, Odisha and Another …. Opposite Parties Mr. Sunil Mishra, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN Order No.

ORDER 22.02.2023 02. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file an appeal in accordance with law.

2.

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. If such appeal is filed not later than 10th April, 2023 accompanied by an application for condonation of delay, citing the pendency of the present petition as reasons for the delay, it will be considered in accordance with law by the Appellate Authority. The Court clarifies that it has not expressed any view in the matter.

3.

It will be open to the Petitioner to request the Appellate Authority for a direction regarding release of documents by the Enforcement Directorate for the purposes of pursuing the appeal.

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.