M/S B.Ramanaiah Constructions, Ganjam vs. The CT And GST Officer, Ganjam Ii

Original PDF →
WP(C)/24690/2022HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01063428202216 March 2023Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI,MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. B. Ramanaiah Constructions, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The respondents were the CT & GST Officer, Ganjam-II Circle, and others. The specific tax period, the order or action under challenge, the authority that passed it, and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the filing of the writ petition is also not detailed.

Held

The Court held that the writ petition should be disposed of as withdrawn, based on the submission made by the petitioner's counsel. The reasoning was solely based on the petitioner's explicit request not to press the matter. The Court granted the petitioner's request for withdrawal. No specific issues regarding GST law were decided, and therefore, no ratio decidendi for future cases on GST matters can be extracted. The operative direction was to dispose of the writ petition as withdrawn.

Key Issues

The Court had to decide whether to permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner's counsel stated that the petitioner did not wish to press the writ petition and sought permission to withdraw it. The revenue or State's contentions are not recorded in the judgment. No specific provisions of the CGST/SGST Act or Rules were argued or relied upon by either party.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P (C) No. 24690 of 2022 M/s. B. Ramanaiah Constructions, ….. Petitioner Mr. J. Kumar Das, Advocate Vs. The CT & GST Officer, Ganjam-II Circle & Ors. ….. Opposite parties Mr. Sunil Mishra, ASC CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN

ORDER 16.03.2023 Order No.

02.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press this writ petition and he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.

3.

In view of the above submission, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

Arun/Aks

(DR. B.R. SARANGI)

JUDGE

(M.S. RAMAN)

JUDGE

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.