The Comnr. Of CT And GST, Odisha vs. Radheshyam Bhoi

Original PDF →
WA/423/2022HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01020812202223 March 2023Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The appellants, the Commissioner of CT & GST, Odisha, and another, are challenging an order passed by a learned Single Judge. The respondent, Radheshyam Bhoi, had filed a writ petition. The impugned order was passed on the very first date of hearing of the writ petition without providing the appellants an opportunity to file a reply. The present appeal was delinked from a connected case at the request of the parties' counsel. The High Court is considering the appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge.

Held

The High Court held that the impugned order was passed on the very first date of hearing without providing the appellants an opportunity to file a reply to the writ petition. This violated the principles of natural justice. Consequently, the High Court set aside the impugned order. The writ petition was restored to the file of the learned Single Judge for hearing on merits. The appellants were directed to file their reply positively on or before July 1, 2023, and the respondent was to file a rejoinder affidavit by July 10, 2023. No further opportunities for filing affidavits would be granted. The learned Single Judge was requested to dispose of the matter expeditiously.

Key Issues

1. Whether the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge was in violation of principles of natural justice by not granting an opportunity to the appellants to file a reply to the writ petition? The appellants argued that the impugned order was passed on the first date of hearing without affording them an opportunity to file a reply to the writ petition, thus violating the principles of natural justice. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.A. No.423 of 2022 The Commissioner of CT & GST, Odisha and Another …. Appellants Mr. Manoj Kumar Khuntia, Addl. Govt. Advocate -versus- Radheshyam Bhoi …. Respondent Mr. P. Sahoo, Advocate CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No.

ORDER 23.03.2023 02. 1. The present appeal is delinked from the connected case as requested by learned counsel for the parties.

2.

On the short ground that the impugned order was passed on the very first date of the hearing without any opportunity to the present Appellant to file a reply to the writ petition, the impugned order is set aside.

3.

W.P.(C) No.25696 of 2021 will be restored to the file of the learned Single Judge in the roster Bench where it will be listed for hearing on 13th July, 2023. 4. Reply will be filed by the present Appellants to the writ petition positively on or before 1st July, 2023 and rejoinder affidavit thereto by 10th July, 2023. It is made clear that none of the parties will be granted any more opportunity for the above purpose.

5.

The learned Single Judge is requested to proceed with the hearing of the matter on merits and dispose it of as expeditiously as possible.

6.

The writ appeal is disposed of in the above terms. An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice

(G. Satapathy) Judge

SK Jena/Secy.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.