Kss Petron PVT LTD. vs. Joint Commissioner Of CT And GST, Bbsr

Original PDF →
RVWPET/80/2023HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01019826202324 March 2023Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, KSS Petron Private Limited, filed a writ petition (W.P.(C) No.8902 of 2022) challenging an order passed by the Joint Commissioner of CT & GST, CT & GST Circle, Bhubaneswar. This Court, by an order dated 22nd February 2023, had disposed of the writ petition by relegating the petitioner to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The petitioner then filed a review petition, pointing out that the NCLT had, in fact, granted permission to the petitioner to pursue remedies against the assessment order. The Court acknowledged that this prior NCLT order was not considered when the writ petition was initially disposed of.

Held

The Court held that the writ petition ought not to have been disposed of by relegating the petitioner to the NCLT, as the NCLT had indeed granted permission to the petitioner to pursue remedies against the assessment order. The Court found that its previous order dated 22nd February 2023, which disposed of W.P.(C) No.8902 of 2022, failed to take into account the order of the NCLT granting such permission. Consequently, the Court recalled its earlier order and restored the writ petition to the file for further consideration. The review petition was accordingly disposed of.

Key Issues

1. Whether the writ petition ought to have been disposed of by relegating the petitioner to the NCLT, given that the NCLT had already granted permission to pursue remedies against the assessment order? The petitioner argued that the previous order of this Court, which disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to approach the NCLT, was erroneous because the NCLT had already granted permission for the petitioner to pursue remedies against the assessment order. The petitioner contended that this crucial fact was overlooked by the Court. The revenue department's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RVWPET No.80 of 2023 KSS Petron Private Limited …. Petitioner Mr. Soayib Qurshi along with Mr. S. Dwibedi and Mr. R.C. Ray, Advocates -versus- Joint Commissioner of CT & GST, CT & GST Circle, Bhubaneswar and others …. Opposite parties Mr. S. S. Padhy, ASC for Revenue Department CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN Order No.

ORDER 24.03.2023

1.

1. It is pointed out in the review petition that NCLT had in fact granted permission to the Petitioner to pursue the remedies against the Assessment order and, therefore, the writ petition ought not to have been disposed of by relegating the Petitioner again to the NCLT.

2.

Indeed, it is seen that the order of the NCLT granting permission to the Petitioner was not taken note of by this Court.

3.

For the above reasons, the order dated 22nd February, 2023 is hereby recalled and W.P.(C) No.8902 of 2022 is restored to file.

4.

The review petition is accordingly disposed of.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice

(M. S. Raman) Judge M. Panda

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.