Rajesh Kumar Rout vs. Commissioner Of State Tax, Cuttack

WP(C)/35389/2023HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01086671202315 November 2023Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI (ACJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the present writ petition (W.P.(C) No.35389 of 2023) is disposed of in terms of the common order previously passed by the Court on November 6, 2023. This common order was in the case of M/s. Pravat Kumar Choudhury and others vs. Additional State Tax Officer, CT & GST, Cuttack and others. The reasoning for this decision is that the present petition is to be governed by the principles and directions laid down in that earlier common order. The specific findings, reasoning, and ratio decidendi of the November 6, 2023 order are not detailed in this judgment. No operative directions are explicitly stated here, other than the disposal of the writ petition in line with the prior order. No issues were expressly left undecided.

Facts

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Rout, filed a writ petition before the Orissa High Court. The petition was disposed of in terms of a common order previously passed by the same Court on November 6, 2023. This common order was in relation to W.P.(C) No.6684 of 2023 and a batch of other writ petitions, specifically concerning cases involving M/s. Pravat Kumar Choudhury and others versus the Additional State Tax Officer, CT & GST, Cuttack, and others. The specific details of the petitioner's grievance or the tax period in question are not elaborated in this order, nor is the amount in dispute or the authority that passed the initial order being challenged.

Key Issues

The judgment does not explicitly state the specific issues that the Court had to decide in this particular writ petition. It only mentions that the matter was disposed of in terms of a previous common order. Therefore, the issues decided in the common order dated November 6, 2023, would be the operative issues for this case. However, the content of that common order is not provided in the text. The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Rout, is represented by Mr. Jagamohan Pattanaik, Advocate, and the Opposite Parties (Revenue) are represented by Mr. Diganta Das, ASC. No specific arguments from either side are recorded in this order.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.35389 of 2023 Rajesh Kumar Rout ….. Petitioner Mr. Jagamohan Pattanaik, Advocate Vs. Commissioner of State Tax, Commissionerate of CT & GST, & Others ….. Opposite Parties Mr. Diganta Das, ASC for revenue CORAM: ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DR. B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

ORDER 15.11.2023

Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the common order passed by this Court on 6th November, 2023 in W.P.(C) No.6684 of 2023 and Batch of Writ Petitions (M/s. Pravat Kumar Choudhury and others vs. Additional State Tax Officer, CT & GST, Cuttack and others).

(DR. B.R. SARANGI)

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

(M.S. RAMAN)

JUDGE Aswini

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.