M/S. Magnum Sea Foods LTD. Bbsr vs. State Of Odisha

Original PDF →
WP(C)/1434/2024HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01003359202418 March 2024Bench: MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH,MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN2 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.1434 of 2024 M/s. Magnum Sea Food Ltd. … Petitioner Mr. Sunshine Anand Swain, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others … Opposite Parties Mr. Sheshadeba Das, Addl. Standing Counsel (CT & GST, Odisha) Mr. Prasanna Ku. Parhi, DSGI and Mr. D. Gochhayat, Advocate Mr. L. Samantaray, Addl. Govt. Advocate CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No.

ORDER 18.03.2024 03. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioner in the present writ application has questioned the constitutional validity of Section 12 of the Odisha Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (OVAT Act). It transpires from the record that challenging the vires of the same provision, the petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing a writ petition giving rise to W.P.(C) No. 349 of 2014. It, however, withdrew the said writ application with a liberty to challenge the impugned assessment order by way of an appeal. It is an admitted fact that the petitioner has filed an appeal against the assessment order in the light of liberty granted by this Court. It has, however, filed the present writ application again questioning the vires of the same provision, which was challenged by it in W.P.(C) No.349 of 2014 and was withdrawn.

3.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that it is evident from the Court’s order dated 07.12.2021 passed in W.P.(C) No. 349 of 2014 that while dismissing the writ application as withdrawn, the Court had not expressed any view in the said matter. In such circumstance, he submits that the petitioner has the liberty to question again the validity of the said provision by filing the present writ application. He further submits that several writ applications are pending in which the question of the constitutional validity of Section 12 of the Odisha Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (OVAT Act) is under challenge.

4.

In the Court’s opinion, the filing of the present writ application is an abuse of the process of the Court in the facts and circumstances. It is, accordingly, dismissed with cost of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) to be deposited by the petitioner in the account of the Orissa High Court Legal Services Committee within one month from today.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice

(M.S. Raman) Judge S.K.Jena/Secy

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.