Samarjeet Pattnaik vs. The Commnr., CGST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate

Original PDF →
WP(C)/9442/2024HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01028153202423 April 2024Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI,MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY2 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 9442 of 2024 Samarjeet Pattnaik ….. Petitioner Mr. R.C. Jena, Advocate Vs. The Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate and others ….. Opposite Parties Mr. M. Agarwal,Jr. Standing Counsel, Central Excise and GST CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

ORDER 23.04.2024

Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The Petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following prayer: “Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is, therefore, the petitioner most humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to: (i) setting aside the bank attachment order dated 28.03.2024 issued by the opposite party No.2 at Annexure-1; (ii) pass an writ order directing the opposite party No.2 to pass fresh order by affording effective opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. (iii) pass order issue direction to the opposite parties to provide certified copies of SCN / Order as requested;

And for this act of kindness, the petitioners, as in duty bound, shall ever pray.”

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has already made representation before the Opposite Party No.3 vide Annexure-2, and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the Opposite Parties has no objection.

5.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.3 to consider and dispose of the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-2 and pass appropriate order as early as possible within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

Priyajit

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE

(G. SATAPATHY)

JUDGE

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.