M/S. Nirmal Enterprises, Keonjhar vs. Asst. Commnr. GST And Central Excise, Keonjhar

Original PDF →
WP(C)/14965/2024HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01043365202428 June 2024Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI,MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY2 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.14965 of 2024 M/s. Nirmal Enterprises, Keonjhar ….. Petitioner Ms. Z. Wallace, Advocate Vs. Assistant Commissioner GST and Central Excise, Keonjhar ….. Opposite Party Mr. A. Kedia, Jr. SC for Revenue CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

ORDER 28.06.2024

Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

The challenge in the present writ petition is to an order dated 29.04.2024 of the Assistant Commissioner, GST & Central Excise, Keonjhar Division, Keonjhar (opposite party no.1) under Section 72 of the Finance Act, 1994 along with interest and penalty for the tax period 2015-16. 3. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that it was passed ex parte. In fact, the petitioner was unable to appear and did not even file a reply to the show cause notice (SCN) issued to him preceding the above assessment order.

4.

In the petition, the petitioner has explained how he was not served with any notice for which he was not able to file reply to the show cause notice.

5.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the petitioner ought to be given one more chance to first reply to the SCN and then appear before the assessing authority for a fresh assessment order to be passed in accordance with law.

6.

Accordingly, while setting aside the impugned assessment order dated 29.04.2024 of Opposite party no.1, this Court directs as under:- (i) The petitioner will first file a reply to the SCN on or before 19.07.2024. (ii) The matter will thereafter be taken up by opposite party no.1 on 22.07.2024, and after hearing the petitioner, a fresh assessment order shall be passed within a period of two months thereafter. If aggrieved by such order, it will be open to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

7.

The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Priyajit

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE

(G. SATAPATHY)

JUDGE

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.