M/S Debjyoti Dutta, Cuttack vs. Chief Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 03.10.2024 01. 1. Mrs. Wallace, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, there was demand made by the State authority for short payment of goods and services tax. Her client preferred appeal. It was rejected. Being aggrieved by the appellate order, her client wants to challenge the same but there is no Tribunal functioning. Her client’s
// 2 //
prayer is actually for adjudication of challenge to appellate order, by which she is aggrieved. Therefore, her client has moved this Court.
She submits, relief sought by her client is covered by order dated 16th February, 2024 made by the first Division Bench in a batch of writ petitions, lead case being W.P.(C) no.42015 of 2023 (M/s. Maa Tarini Traders).
Mr. Mishra, learned advocate, Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State revenue and Mr. Kedia, learned advocate, for Central revenue. They do not dispute that the writ petition stands covered.
The first Division Bench directed a quantum of deposit with liberty to parties inasmuch as, petitioners could avail of their remedy upon constitution of the Tribunal and in event they or any one of them does not do so within time provided upon reconstitution, the department would be free to proceed.
The writ petition is disposed of as covered by M/s. Maa Tarini Traders (supra).
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
(M.S. Sahoo)
Judge Prasant
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.