M/S. Rechargekit Fintech (P) LTD. Bbsr vs. Asst. Commnr. Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bbsr
Held
The Court directed the revenue to furnish copies of documents obtained from the enforcement authority to the petitioner. No action is to be taken on the audit report for two weeks after these copies are provided.
Facts
The petitioner challenged a notice for conducting an audit, stating their reply was not considered. The revenue claimed the audit was completed after receiving documents from an enforcement unit.
Key Issues
Whether the petitioner's reply was considered before issuing audit notices and if the audit process was fair.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2024
The writ petition was moved on 7th October, 2024. Mr. Roy, learned advocate appearing on behalf of petitioner had submitted, impugned is notice da
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.