M/S Gajalaxmi Agencicy (Ksk),Bargarh vs. The Principal Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax
Held
The Court condoned the delay in the petitioner's request for relief. It directed that the petitioner's application for revocation of cancellation will be considered subject to them depositing all due taxes, interest, late fee, penalty, and complying with other formalities.
Facts
The petitioner's GST registration was cancelled. The petitioner is willing to pay all outstanding dues, including tax, interest, late fee, and penalty, to have their registration reinstated.
Key Issues
Whether the delay in seeking revocation of GST registration cancellation should be condoned, and if the petitioner is willing to clear dues, should their application be considered?
Sections Cited
Rule 23
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2024
Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 14th November, 2023 followed by order dated 15th January, 2024 cancelling his client’s registra
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.