M/S. Paras Pharmaceuticals, Sambalpur vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court noted that a circular issued by the revenue requires assessees to apply for rectification under Section 148 if no appeal has been filed. Since the petitioner invoked writ jurisdiction instead of filing an appeal, they must comply with this circular.
Facts
The petitioner's Input Tax Credit (ITC) was disallowed due to the delayed filing of their GSTR-3B return. The petitioner argues that an amendment to Section 16 of the CGST Act extended the time for filing returns for the financial year 2018-19.
Key Issues
Whether the disallowance of ITC for delayed return filing is valid given the subsequent amendment extending the filing period. Whether the petitioner should be directed to seek rectification under Section 148 as per a departmental circular.
Sections Cited
Section 73, Section 16, Section 148
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2024
Mrs. Wallace, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner an
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.