M/S. City Ply And Hardware,Sambalpur vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court noted that a circular issued by the revenue department requires assessees to apply for rectification under Section 148 if no appeal has been filed. Since the time for such an application is still available, the petitioner should comply with this procedure.
Facts
The petitioner's Input Tax Credit (ITC) was disallowed due to the delayed filing of GSTR-3B. The petitioner argued that an amendment to Section 16 of the CGST Act extended the time for filing returns, and their return was filed within this extended period.
Key Issues
Whether the disallowance of ITC for delayed GSTR-3B filing is valid in light of an amendment extending the filing period, and if the petitioner should pursue rectification under Section 148.
Sections Cited
Section 73, Section 16, Section 148
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2024
Mrs. Wallace, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner an
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.