M/S Maa Tarini Enterprises, Jharsuguda vs. Union Of INDIA

WP(C)/29928/2024HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01083104202404 December 2024Bench: MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA,MR. JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO2 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court condoned the delay in the petitioner's request for revocation of cancellation. The department is directed to consider the petitioner's application subject to payment of all dues and compliance with formalities.

Facts

The petitioner's GST registration was cancelled. The petitioner is willing to pay all dues including tax, interest, late fee, and penalty to have their registration restored.

Key Issues

Whether the delay in seeking revocation of GST registration cancellation can be condoned and if the petitioner can be allowed to regularize their compliance.

Sections Cited

Rule 23

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.29928 of 2024 M/s. Maa Tarini Enterprises …. Petitioner Represented By Adv. – Mr. Abhilash Mishra, Advocate -versus- Union of India and others …. Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. – Mr. C.S. Mishra, Senior Standing Counsel CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO Order No.
04.12.

2024

01.

1. Mr. Mishra, learned advocate appears on beha

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.