M/S. Sunita Parida, Jagatsinghpur vs. State Tax Officer, Jagatsinghpur
Held
The Court condoned the delay in the petitioner's request for revocation of cancellation. The department is directed to consider the petitioner's application subject to payment of all dues and compliance with formalities.
Facts
The petitioner's GST registration was cancelled. The petitioner is willing to pay all outstanding taxes, interest, late fees, and penalties to have their registration reinstated.
Key Issues
Whether the delay in seeking revocation of GST registration cancellation should be condoned. Whether the petitioner should be allowed to reinstate their registration upon payment of dues.
Sections Cited
Rule 23
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2024
1. Mr. Panigrahi, learned advocate appe
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.