M/S. K.P. Sugandh Limited, Sambalpur vs. Chief Comnr Of CT And GST, Odisha, Cuttack
Held
The Court held that the impugned order was passed on the 8th day from the date of service of the notice, failing to meet the requirement of Section 129(3). The communication of the order was not sufficiently proven to have been made within the stipulated time.
Facts
The petitioner challenged an order imposing a GST demand under Section 129, arguing it was passed beyond the prescribed 7-day period from the notice service. The revenue contended the order was passed within time and communicated via email.
Key Issues
Whether the GST demand order under Section 129 was passed within the statutory 7-day period from the date of service of notice, and if the communication of the order was validly effected.
Sections Cited
Section 129, Section 169, Rule 142
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
J U D G M E N T
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dates of hearing:12th and 17th December, 2024
Date of judgment : 17th December, 2024 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARINDAM SINHA, J.
Mr. Kar, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, impugned is order dated 27th September,
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.