Mahendra Kumar Sahoo vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs (CBIC), New Delhi
Held
The High Court set aside the impugned order, exercising its extraordinary writ jurisdiction. It granted the petitioner one final opportunity to present their case with all documents to the authority.
Facts
The petitioner challenged a GST demand order (DRC-07) and sought an opportunity to present their case. The petitioner claimed a misunderstanding of a notice regarding document submission, while the revenue argued no grounds for interference existed.
Key Issues
Whether the petitioner should be granted a further opportunity to present their case before the GST authority, given the alleged misunderstanding of a notice.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2024
Mr. Kar, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is demand on form GST DRC-07 dated 27th December, 2023. He points out from the annexure being the order that there is statement therein
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.