M/S Tejas Engineering Infra,Koraput vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax , Odisha

Original PDF →
WP(C)/16091/2025HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01040784202519 June 2025Bench: MR. JUSTICE HARISH TANDON (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN2 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.16091 of 2025 M/s. Tejas Engineering Infra, Koraput …. Petitioner Mr. S.A. Mohanty, Advocate -versus- The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Goods and Services Tax, Odisha & Another …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No.

ORDER 19.06.2025

01.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2.

Mr. Mohanty, learned Advocate appears on behalf of the petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 16.12.2024 followed by order dated 16.01.2025 cancelling his client’s registration under Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. She submits, her client is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of her client to be accepted by the Department. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) No.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others). She submits, her client’s claim to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order.

3.

Mr. Das, learned Additional Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the Opposite Party-Department.

4.

We reproduce below paragraph-2 from said order in M/s.

2

Amit/ Narayan Mohanty Enterprises (supra); “2. In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law.”

Likewise direction is made in this writ petition. Petitioner gets the relief in the interest of revenue.

5.

The writ petition is disposed of

(Harish Tandon)

Chief Justice

(M.S. Raman)

Judge

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.