Akibar Rahman vs. The State Of Assam
Held
The Court ordered the release of the applicant, Akibar Rahman, on bail. The reasoning was based on the applicant's period of custody since March 12, 2023, the fact that the correct GST amount and penalty had been recovered, and the release of the involved trucks. Additionally, the Court considered that other individuals involved in the occurrence had already been granted pre-arrest bail. The ratio decidendi is that when the primary objective of recovering tax dues has been met, and other co-accused have been granted bail, continued custodial detention of the applicant may not be necessary, provided they cooperate with the investigation. The operative direction is to release the applicant on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 30,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bongaigaon. The applicant is also directed to render full cooperation in the investigation and not leave the jurisdiction of the Investigating Officer without prior intimation. No issue was expressly left undecided.
Facts
The applicant, Akibar Rahman, was arrested on March 12, 2023, in connection with Jogighopa P.S. Case No. 96/2023, registered under Sections 120(B)/420/468/471/34 IPC. The case involves four trucks. The applicant sought release on bail. The judgment notes that the correct amount of GST along with penalty has been recovered, and the four trucks have been released by the authorities. The applicant's statement has been recorded, and the investigation is ongoing with documents seized. The applicant has been in custody since March 12, 2023. The applicant's counsel also submitted that other individuals involved in the occurrence have been granted pre-arrest bail by the High Court.
Key Issues
1. Whether the applicant, Akibar Rahman, is entitled to be released on bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Jogighopa P.S. Case No. 96/2023, considering the stage of investigation and recovery of GST dues? Petitioner's Arguments: - The applicant has been in custody since March 12, 2023. - The correct amount of GST along with penalty has been recovered, and the trucks involved have been released. - The applicant's statement has been recorded. - Other individuals involved in the occurrence have already been granted pre-arrest bail by this Court, citing A.B. No. 1012/2023. Revenue/State's Arguments: - The judgment records that the State, represented by the learned Addl. P.P. Assam, produced the Case Diary, indicating their participation. However, specific arguments against bail are not detailed in the provided text.
Sections Cited
Section 439 Cr.P.C.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER Date : 03-04-2023
Heard Mr. S. Munir, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. D. Das, learned Addl. P.P. Assam appearing for the State who has produced the Case Diary.
Page No.# 2/3 By filing this application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. the applicant is praying for an order for his release on bail. The applicant herein was arrested on 12-03-2023 in connection with Jogighopa P.S. Case No. 96/2023 registered under Sections 120(B)/420/468/471/34 IPC and since then, he is in custody. It appears that after recovering the correct amount of GST along with penalty, the four trucks involved in the i
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Gauhati High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.