M/S Mb Omm vs. The State Of Assam And 2 Ors
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s MB OMM, a proprietorship concern operating a house boat and holding GST registration, filed a writ petition before the Gauhati High Court. The respondents were the State of Assam, represented by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam, Tourism Department, and the Assam Tourism Development Corporation Limited, including its Managing Director. The specific tax period(s) and the exact order or action under challenge, as well as the authority that passed it, are not detailed in the provided excerpt. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned.
Held
The Court noted that the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S. Banik, stated that he would not like to press the instant writ petition. Consequently, the Court held that the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. The interim order, if any, passed earlier was also vacated. No specific findings on GST provisions or amounts were made as the petition was withdrawn without adjudication.
Key Issues
The Court had to decide whether to proceed with the writ petition. The petitioner, through their counsel Mr. S. Banik, indicated they did not wish to press the petition. The respondents, represented by Ms. P. Baruah, Mr. R. S. Mishra, and Mr. M. Chetia, did not present any arguments as the petitioner withdrew their case. Therefore, the primary issue was the petitioner's intention to withdraw the writ petition.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER Date : 05.08.2025
Mr. S. Banik, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that he would not like to press the instant writ petition.
Consequently, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Reproduced from the public record of the Gauhati High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.