M/S Shaarc Projects LTD. And Anr. vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 Ors.
Held
The Court held that the show cause notice dated March 8, 2022, proposing the cancellation of the petitioners' GST registration, was vague and lacked the necessary material particulars. Consequently, the notice could not be sustained in law and was set aside and quashed. The reasoning was based on the perusal of the notice itself, which revealed its deficiency in specifying the exact provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, or the Rules thereunder that were allegedly not complied with. The ratio decidendi is that a show cause notice must contain specific details of the alleged non-compliance to be legally valid. The writ petition was disposed of with the operative direction that the quashing of the notice would not prevent the respondent authorities from taking fresh steps in accordance with the CGST Act and Rules if any infraction of the provisions is found.
Facts
M/s Shaarc Projects Ltd. and its Assistant Manager, Nilesh Kumar Mishra, filed a writ petition before the Gauhati High Court challenging a show cause notice dated March 8, 2022. This notice proposed the cancellation of the petitioners' GST registration due to alleged non-compliance with specified provisions of the GST Act or its Rules. The High Court had previously issued an interim order preventing coercive action against the petitioners. The respondents, including the Union of India, State of Assam, CBIC, Assistant Commissioner, and Superintendent of CGST, were represented. The petitioners did not appear for the hearing.
Key Issues
1. Whether the show cause notice dated March 8, 2022, issued for cancellation of GST registration, is legally sustainable in law? The petitioners argued that the show cause notice was vague and lacked material particulars, rendering it unsustainable. The respondents, represented by Mr. S.C. Keyal, Sr. Advocate, and Mr. K. Jain, Advocate, appeared and were heard. The Court perused the show cause notice. No specific arguments from the respondents regarding the validity of the notice were recorded, other than their appearance and the Court's perusal of the notice.
Sections Cited
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010125632022
2026:GAU-AS:9850
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4269/2022 M/S SHAARC PROJECTS LTD. AND ANR. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT C/309, 3RD FLOOR, MEGHMALHAR COMPLEX SECTOR-11 GANDHI NAGAR 382011 GUJRAT AND HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE UNIT AT BAHADURPUR, MOIRANBAND KACHAR, ASSAM-788009 REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI NILESH KUMAR MISHRA 2: NILESH KUMAR MISHRA S/O SHRIMANI MISHRA ONE OF THE ASSISTANT MANAGER (ACCOUNT AND TAXATION) OF M/S SHAARC PROJECTS LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT C/309 3RD FLOOR MEGHMALHAR COMPLEX SECTOR-11 GANDHI NAGAR 382011 GUJRAT AND HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE UNIT AT BAHADURPUR MOIRANBAND KACHAR ASSAM-78800 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. SERVICE THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVT. OF INDIA DEPTT. OF REVENUE HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110001 SERVICE THROUGH MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE 2:STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY FINANCE DEPTT. GOVT. OF ASSAM 3:CENTAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUMTOMS NOTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-11001 4:ASSISTANT COMMISSI
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Gauhati High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.