Nikhil Sharma vs. The State Of Assam
Held
The Court considered the submissions of both parties and perused the case diary. While acknowledging the petitioner's argument regarding the duration of his detention and the applicability of statutory detention periods, the Court found that there were sufficient incriminating materials against the petitioner and the investigation was not yet complete. Consequently, the Court was not inclined to grant bail at this stage. The application for regular bail was therefore rejected. The Court did not expressly leave any issues undecided.
Facts
The petitioner, Nikhil Sharma, is seeking regular bail in connection with Boko P.S. Case No. 143/2026. An FIR was lodged on June 1, 2026, by Janardhan Deka, who alleged that the petitioner, posing as a Chartered Accountant, induced him to pay approximately Rs. 2,44,12,247/- for depositing with tax and other statutory departments, including GST. The informant discovered he had been defrauded when he received a notice from the GST authority on January 20, 2026, indicating zero cash tax payment despite substantial turnover. The petitioner has been in jail for 47 days. The State opposed the bail application, citing sufficient incriminating materials and ongoing investigation.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, considering he has been in custody for 47 days and the alleged offences under Sections 316(4)/318(4)/336(2)/338/340(2) of the BNS are not attracting statutory detention beyond this period? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner's counsel argued that further custodial detention is unnecessary given the 47 days already spent in jail. They contended that the statutory detention period for Section 338 of the BNS is not applicable to the offences alleged in the FIR and that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation. Revenue/State's Argument: The learned APP argued that there are sufficient incriminating materials against the petitioner and the investigation is still incomplete.
Sections Cited
Section 483, Section 316(4), Section 318(4), Section 336(2), Section 338, Section 340(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER Date : 10.08.2026
Heard Mr. B.D. Konwar, learned senior counsel for the accused/applicants. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned APP for the State.
Page No.# 2/3
This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of regular bail to the accused/applicant in connection with Boko P.S. Case No. 143/2026 registered under Sections 316(4)/ 318(4)/ 336(2)/ 338/ 340(2) of the BN
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Gauhati High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.