U.P. Projects Consultants PVT. LTD. Thru. Its Auth. Signatory Lko. vs. State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Tax And Registration Lko. And 3 Others
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT TAX No. - 914 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 30.12.2023 passed under Section 73 of the GST Act as well as the order dated 23.08.2025 whereby the appeal was dismissed as being beyond limitation.
Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no opportunity of hearing was granted while passing the order under Section 73. 4. Learned Standing Counsel, based upon instructions, states that in the show-cause notice, prior date was mentioned for date of personal hearing than the date of filing of reply and in the reminder, 'NA' was mentioned in 7. Orders dated 30.12.2023 & 23.08.2025 are quashed. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheeraj Srivastava, Pooja Maurya, Shalinee Mani Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. U.P. Projects Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Its Auth. Signatory Lko. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Tax And Registration Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Matter is remanded to the assessing authority to pass fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. September 12, 2025 nishant WTAX No. 914 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.