Ghanshyam Kaushal vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Commercial Tax Lko. And 2 Others

Original PDF →
WTAX/924/2025HC AllahabadGSTCNR UPHC02071840202517 September 2025Bench: PANKAJ BHATIA2 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT TAX No. - 924 of 2025

Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2.

Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 26.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the GST Act as well as the order dated 08.08.2025 whereby the appeal was dismissed.

3.

Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no opportunity of hearing was granted while passing the order under Section 73. 4. Learned Standing Counsel, based upon instructions, states that in the show-cause notice, same date was mentioned for personal hearing and date

7.

Orders dated 26.04.2024 & 08.08.2025 are quashed. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh, Shashank Vikram Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ghanshyam Kaushal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Commercial Tax Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

8.

Matter is remanded to the assessing authority to pass fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. September 17, 2025 nishant WTAX No. 924 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.