Shubham Chaturvedi,Proprietor M/S Gaurav Enterprises vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. State Tax Lko. And Another

WTAX/1634/2025HC AllahabadGSTCNR UPHC02100867202519 December 2025Bench: SHEKHAR B. SARAF,MANJIVE SHUKLA3 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that an opportunity of personal hearing must be granted before passing an adverse assessment order, irrespective of whether the assessee requested it or indicated otherwise in the notice. The principle of natural justice requires this minimal opportunity.

Facts

The petitioner challenged an assessment order raising a tax demand. The petitioner argued that they were denied an opportunity of oral hearing as indicated by 'NA' in the notice, despite Section 75(4) of the U.P. GST Act mandating such an opportunity.

Key Issues

Whether the Assessing Authority is bound to provide an opportunity of personal hearing to the assessee before passing an adverse assessment order, even if the assessee indicated no desire for it in the notice?

Sections Cited

Section 75(4)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT TAX No. - 1634 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.

1.

Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the assessee and Sri Sanjay Sareen, learned counsel for the revenue.

2.

Challenge has been raised to the order dated April 19, 2024 passed by the Commercial/State Tax Officer/Assistant Commissioner, Ambedkar nagar Sector-1, Ayodhya (A), Ayodhya for the tax period 2018-19, whereby demand has been raised against the present petitioner.

3.

Solitary ground being pressed in the present petition is, the only notice in the proceedings was issued to the petitioner on January 23, 2024 seeking his reply within 30 days. Referring to item no. 3 of the table appended to that notice, it has been pointed out, the Assessing Authority had at that stage itself chosen to not give any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner by mentioning "NA" against column description "Date of personal hearing". Similar endorsements were made against the columns for "Time of personal hearing" and "Venue where personal hearing will be held". Thus, it is the objection of learned counsel for the petitioner, the

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.