Naresh Kumar Gupta vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax Delhi West & Anr.

Original PDF →
W.P.(C)/16205/2025HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01081047202506 November 2025Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Dev Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. Aditya Singla, Adv
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The Petitioner, Naresh Kumar Gupta, filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court seeking payment of a refund. The refund application was submitted on December 8, 2018. The Petitioner relied on a previous judgment by the same High Court in the case of GS Industries v. Commissioner of Central Tax and GST Delhi West, which established a detailed timeline for refund payments. The Respondents are the Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Delhi West, and another authority.

Held

The Court held that the Petitioner's refund application should be processed in accordance with the judgment delivered in the case of GS Industries v. Commissioner of Central Tax and GST Delhi West. The Court directed that an order for the payment of the refund should be passed within one month from the date of the present order. The Court explicitly stated that all contentions left open and that the rights and remedies of the parties are also left open. This implies that the merits of the refund claim itself were not adjudicated upon in this order, but rather the procedural aspect of timely processing was addressed.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to a refund in accordance with the timeline established in the GS Industries judgment? (Question of law) Petitioner's arguments: The Petitioner contended that their refund application, filed on December 8, 2018, should be processed and paid within the timeline stipulated by this Court in the case of GS Industries v. Commissioner of Central Tax and GST Delhi West. They sought adherence to the established procedural framework for refund disbursal. Revenue's arguments: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the Respondents. However, the Court's direction implies that the Respondents were expected to process the refund application.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16205/2025 NARESH KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dev Sharma, Adv. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DELHI WESTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aditya Singla, Adv. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

O R D E R % 06.11.2025

1.

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2.

The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking payment of refund in terms of application dated 8th December, 2018. 3. The Petitioner relies upon the decision of this Court in W.P.(C) 7485/2024 titled GS Industries v. Commissioner of Central Tax and GST Delhi West, wherein the detailed timeline for payment of refund has already been settled.

4.

In view thereof, let the refund applications of the Petitioner be processed in accordance with the judgment in GS Industries (supra).

5.

Let the order be passed within a month from this order. All contentions left open. Rights and remedies are also left open. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2025 at 12:52:58

6.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in these terms. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed of. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. MADHU JAIN, J. NOVEMBER 6, 2025 dj/sm This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2025 at 12:52:58

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.