M/S Shree Lakshmi Road Transport Corporation & Anr. vs. Devyani International Limited

Original PDF →
ARB.P./1562/2025HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01070407202503 December 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Nishant Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Charis Yadav, Adv
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The petitioners, M/s Shree Lakshmi Road Transport Corporation & Anr., filed an application seeking modification of a previous order dated December 3, 2025. The original order disposed of a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioners contended that the previous order incorrectly recorded the amount due as Rs. 8,62,500/-. They asserted that the actual amount due as of August 2025 is Rs. 41,68,650/- plus GST, along with unpaid rent/mesne profits from September 2025 onwards. The respondent, Devyani International Limited, was served advance notice and did not object to the modification.

Held

The Court allowed the application for modification. It directed that paragraph 3 of the order dated December 3, 2025, be amended to accurately reflect the amount due. The revised paragraph now states that the amount due till August 2025 is Rs. 41,68,650/- plus GST, and that unpaid rent/mesne profits from September 2025 onwards are also due and payable by the respondent. The Court reasoned that the modification was necessary to correct a factual discrepancy in the previously recorded amount. The ratio is that High Courts, in proceedings under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, can correct factual inaccuracies in their orders upon application and with the consent of the parties, to ensure the record accurately reflects the claims being adjudicated. The operative direction was to read the modified paragraph as part of the original order.

Key Issues

1. Whether the amount due as of August 2025, including GST and subsequent unpaid rent/mesne profits, should be accurately reflected in the Court's order, as per the contention of the petitioners under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996? The petitioners argued that the previous order contained a factual error regarding the quantum of dues. They stated that the amount due till August 2025 is Rs. 41,68,650/- plus GST, and further amounts for unpaid rent/mesne profits from September 2025 onwards are also due. They relied on the arbitration clause within their agreement and the issuance of a Section 21 notice under the Arbitration Act. The respondent, through their counsel, had no objection to the prayer for modification.

Sections Cited

Section 11(6), Section 21

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 1562/2025 M/S SHREE LAKSHMI ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Nishant Gupta, Adv. versus DEVYANI INTERNATIONAL LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Charis Yadav, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

O R D E R %

06.01.

2026

I.A. 32194/2025

1.

This application is filed seeking modification of the order dated 03.12.2025 whereby the petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was disposed of.

2.

The prayer made is that in paragraph 3 of the order dated 03.12.2025 it was recorded that the amount due as on date was Rs.8,62,500/- whereas the amount due as per the applicant till August 2025 is Rs. 41,68,650/- plus GST and also the unpaid rent/mesne profits from September 2025 onwards are due.

3.

Ms. Charis Yadav, learned counsel for the non-applicant appears on advance notice and has no objection for the acceptance of the prayer.

4.

For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/01/2026 at 12:35:28

5.

Accordingly, paragraph 3 of the order dated 03.12.2025 be read as under:

“3. It is stated that Clause 5.31 of the Agreement contains an Arbitration Clause which provides that disputes arising between the parties under the Agreement shall be decided by means of Arbitration and the seat of Arbitration shall be Delhi. It is stated by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the amount due till August 2025 is Rs. 41,68,650/- plus GST and also the unpaid rent/mesne profits from September 2025 onwards are due and payable by the Respondent. It is stated that Notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act was issued by the Petitioner on 26.04.2025 which has not been replied to by the Respondent. The Petitioner has, thereafter, approached this Court by filing the present Petition.”

6.

This order be read as part of the order dated 03.12.2025. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 6, 2026 ‘ha’

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/01/2026 at 12:35:28

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.