M/S Seaton Impex Thorugh Its Proprietor Sh Harmeet Singh vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii Avato & Anr.
Held
The Court set aside the impugned order, granting the petitioner an opportunity to file a reply to the show cause notice. The adjudicating authority was directed to consider the reply and submissions and pass a fresh reasoned order.
Facts
The petitioner challenged an order and show cause notice related to GST for the tax period April 2019 to March 2020. The petitioner had not filed a reply to the show cause notice or attended personal hearings.
Key Issues
Whether the petitioner was denied an opportunity to be heard, and if the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication considering the pending challenge to the validity of certain notifications.
Sections Cited
Section 168A, Section 73
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
The Petitioner - M/s Seaton Impex through its Proprietor Mr. Harmeet Singh has filed the present petition inter alia, challenging the impugned order dated 22nd July, 2024 passed by the Sales Tax Officer Class II/AVATO, Ward 83, Zone-7, Delhi for the tax period April 2019 to March 2020 (hereinafter, ‘impugned order’), as also the show cause notice dated 21st May, 2024 (hereinafter, ‘impugned SCN’).
Additionally, the present petition also challenges the vires of the Notification No
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.