Md. Aniqul Islam vs. Directorate Of Goods And Services Tax Intelligence, Delhi

W.P.(CRL)/1710/2024HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01033205202416 December 2025Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA22 pages
For Petitioner: Ms. Manisha Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr.Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr.Dipak Raj, Mr. Priyatam and Ms. Garima Kumar, Advocates
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The High Court held that summons issued under Section 70 of the CGST Act are for gathering information and producing documents during an inquiry, not for initiating proceedings. It found the writ petitions challenging the summons to be premature, as entertaining them at this stage would paralyze the investigation.

Facts

Two petitioners, a bidi supplier and a bidi manufacturer, faced searches and seizures by DGGI. They were subsequently issued summons under Section 70 of the CGST Act, 2017. They challenged these summons, alleging mala fide intent, procedural irregularities (handwritten, no DIN), and that the summons were premature.

Key Issues

Whether summons issued under Section 70 of the CGST Act, 2017 can be challenged through a writ petition at the investigative stage, and if alleged procedural irregularities render such summons invalid.

Sections Cited

Section 70, Rule 139(3), Section 69, Section 132

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.(CRL) 1710/2024
W.P.(CRL) 1861/2024

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

W.P.(CRL) 1710/2024 & 1861/2024 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %

Reserved on: 22nd September, 2025 Pronounced on: 16th December, 2025 +

W.P.(CRL) 1710/2024, CRL.M.A. 16659/2024

MD. ANIQUL ISLAM S/o Sabar Ali R/o Gali No. 2, New Shastri Park, Delhi.

.....Petitioner

Through: Ms. Manisha Gupta, Advocate.

versus

DIRECTORATE OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE, DELHI through its Superintendent/Senior Intelligence Officer, Delhi Zonal Unit, DGGI, MTNL Building, Near Manipal Hospital, Sector-6, Dwarka, Delhi.

.....Respondent Through: Mr.Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr.Dipak Raj, Mr. Priyatam and Ms. Garima Kumar, Advocates. + W.P.(CRL) 1861/2024, CRL.M.A. 19746/2024 & 20363/2024

AKHTAR HUSSAIN Prop. Nila Biri Factory, Dohabari, Uttar Dinajpur, West Bengal.

.....Petitioner

Through: Ms. Manisha Gupta, Advocate.

versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE (DGGI) through its Superintendent/Senior Intelligence Officer, Delhi Zonal Unit, DGGI, MTNL Building, Near Manipal

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.