Sight And Sound INDIA Prlv Ate Limited vs. The Commissioner Of SGST & Anr.
Held
The Court set aside the impugned order and granted the petitioner an opportunity to file a reply to the Show Cause Notice. The matter was remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication.
Facts
The petitioner challenged a Show Cause Notice and an order confirming a GST demand. The petition also challenged the vires of certain notifications related to extensions of time limits.
Key Issues
The primary issue was the validity of notifications extending time limits for adjudication. Additionally, the petitioner argued they were not afforded a proper opportunity to be heard.
Sections Cited
Section 168A, Section 73
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 82592/2025 & CM APPL. 82593/2025 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 19770/2025
The Petitioner – Sight and Sound India Private Limited has filed the present petition under Articles 226 and 227of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 27th September, 2023 (hereinafter, ‘impugned SCN’) as also the impugned order dated 20th November, 2023 passed by the Sales Tax Officer Class II/AVATO, Ward 88, Zone-8, for the tax period July 2017 to March 2018(h
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.