Globe Overseas PVT. LTD. Through Its Director Vipin Mittal vs. Commissioner Of Dgst And Ors.
Held
The Court found the petitioner's claim of not receiving the SCN untenable due to portal changes. However, following precedent, the Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to provide the petitioner an opportunity to file a reply and be heard.
Facts
The petitioner challenged an order raising a GST demand and several notifications. The petitioner claimed they did not receive the show cause notice (SCN) and reminder, leading to an ex-parte order. The respondents argued the notices were properly uploaded on the GST portal.
Key Issues
Whether the petitioner was afforded a proper opportunity to respond to the SCN and whether the impugned notifications are valid.
Sections Cited
Section 168A, Section 73
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CM APPL. 82052/2025 & CM APPL. 82053/2025 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. W.P.(C) 19657/2025
The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 24th August, 2024 passed by the Sales Tax Officer W.P.(C) 19
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.