Sandhya Bhardwaj vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.

Original PDF →
W.P.(C)/342/2024HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01008933202418 August 2026Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Ms. RupamKumari, Mr. Udit Bakshi& Ms. Avantika Shankar, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Anish Roy, SSC CBIC

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010089332024 + W.P.(C) 342/2024, CM APPL. 1552/2024 SANDHYA BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Ms. RupamKumari, Mr. Udit Bakshi& Ms. Avantika Shankar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anish Roy, SSC CBIC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

O R D E R %

18.08.

2026

1.

Through the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner seeks quashing of the Show Cause Notice dated 29th October, 2023, whereby the Petitioner was called upon to show cause as to why an order cancelling his Goods and Services Tax (hereinafter, “GST”) Registration be not passed.

2.

It is an admitted position that an order cancelling the Petitioner’s GST Registration was subsequently passed on 30th October, 2023. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner’s GST Registration had earlier also been cancelled; however, an application seeking revocation of the said cancellation was allowed on 27th September, 2023. He submits that, immediately thereafter, another Show Cause Notice dated 29th September, 2023, came to be issued.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent, on the other This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2026 at 11:26:51

hand, submits that the competent authority was required to select the option for seeking certain clarifications from the Petitioner. However, inadvertently, the option for revocation of the Petitioner’s GST Registration was selected, resulting in issuance of the impugned notice.

4.

This Court has further been informed that, upon inspection of the premises, the Petitioner’s Firm was found to be non-existent.

5.

Against the order cancelling his GST Registration, two statutory remedies are available to Petitioner, namely, to seek revocation of the cancellation of the GST Registration or to prefer an appeal before the competent Appellate Authority.

6.

In view of the disputed questions of fact arising for consideration, this Court is not inclined to exercise its writ juri iction and accordingly, relegates the Petitioner to the aforesaid statutory remedies.

7.

In case the Petitioner files an application seeking revocation of the cancellation of his GST Registration or prefers an appeal, as the case may be, within a period of 15 days from today, the same shall be considered and decided on merits without being rejected on the ground of limitation.

8.

With the aforesaid observations, the present Writ Petition, along with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. SHAIL JAIN, J. AUGUST 18, 2026/PT/MM This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2026 at 11:26:51

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.