Pritu Jain vs. State (Nct Of Delhi) & Anr.

W.P.(CRL)/1384/2026HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01018134202603 September 2026Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Vivek K. Yadav, Advocate (VC)For Respondent: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC along with SI Neeraj Kumar
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court directed the Investigating Officer to verify the genuineness of the fifteen invoices, actual transactions, movement of goods, relevant GST records, and availment of GST benefits. If the invoices are found genuine, a closure report should be submitted; otherwise, the IO is free to take appropriate steps.

Facts

The petitioner sought to quash an FIR registered under Section 420 IPC, alleging fabrication of fifteen invoices. The petitioner contended that if the invoices were genuine, no case would be made out against them.

Key Issues

The key legal issue was whether the FIR, based on alleged fabricated invoices and related GST benefits, should be quashed, pending verification of the genuineness of these invoices and transactions.

Sections Cited

None

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010181342026 + W.P.(CRL) 1384/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13262/2026 PRITU JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek K. Yadav, Advocate (VC) versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC along with SI Neeraj Kumar. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

O R D E R %

03.09.

2026

1.

The petition is for the following relief: “A. Quash the FIR No. 0122/2025, Dated 25.02.2025, Under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code, Registered at Police Station Subhash Place, Delhi and subsequent consequential proceedings arising there from, insofar as the Petitioners are concerned. in the interest of justice. B. Direct that no coercive steps be taken against the Petitioners in FIR No. 0122/2025, Dated 25.02.2025, Under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code, Registered at Police Station Subhash Place, Delhi during pendency of the present petition.”

2.

The crux of the allegation lies in fifteen alleged fabricated invoices. If the invoices are found to be genuine, probably no case against the petitioner would be made out.

3.

Learned counsel, on instructions, submits that the

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.