Manoj Bansal vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors
Held
The High Court declined to exercise its extraordinary writ jurisdiction, directing the petitioners to avail the efficacious statutory alternative remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act. It clarified that the pre-deposit for appeals would be governed by Section 107(6) as it stood on the date of issuance of the Show Cause Notices.
Facts
Petitioners challenged adjudication orders imposing penalties and initiating proceedings under the GST Act, raising various grounds including natural justice violations, evidentiary issues, and the competence of authorities, through writ petitions before the High Court.
Key Issues
Whether the High Court should exercise writ jurisdiction against adjudication orders when an alternative remedy under Section 107 is available, and questions regarding the competence of officers and the applicability of Section 122(1) to non-taxable persons.
Sections Cited
Section 107, Section 122(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
W.P.(C) 8829/2026 & connected matters $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %
Judgment reserved on: 20.08.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 07.09.2026 Judgment uploaded on: 07.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010280552026 + W.P.(C) 8829/2026, CM APPL. 41299/2026, CM APPL. 41300/2026
ROHIT GARG
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Singh Rawat, Mr. Lalit Mohan Pant and Mr. Abhinav Kalra, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, SSC along with Mr. Iqbal Singh Bedi and Mr.Latin Kumar Gaur, Advs.
# CNR No. DLHC010282812026 + W.P.(C) 8892/2026, CM APPL. 41609/2026, CM APPL. 41610/2026
MANOJ BANSAL
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Singh Rawat, Mr. Lalit Mohan Pant and Mr. Abhinav Kalra, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, SSC along with Mr. Iqbal Singh Bedi and Mr. Latin Kumar Gaur, Advs. # CNR No. DLHC010282722026 + W.P.(C) 8893/2026, CM APPL. 41611/2026, CM APPL. 41612/2026
SAGAR GARG
.....Petitione
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.