Ivy Entertainment Private Limited vs. Prince Pictures & Anr.

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/383/2026HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01041361202609 September 2026Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA6 pages
For Petitioner: Dr. Amit George, Mr. Dhiraj Mhetre, Ms. Shivani Sharma, Mr. Sanampreet Singh, Mr. Nikhil Singh and Ms. Tanushree Gupta, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr. Pulkit Agarwal and Mr. Shubham, Advocates
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Delhi High Court noted that the parties had successfully reached a settlement, recorded in a Joint Proposal and a Settlement Agreement. The Court perused the terms, found them lawful, and directed the parties to remain bound by the settlement. The petition was disposed of in terms of the settlement.

Facts

Ivy Entertainment Private Limited filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an injunction and security for INR 71.61 Crores plus GST and interest from Prince Pictures. The amount was due under various agreements related to the film 'Sardar 2', which the respondent failed to pay.

Key Issues

The key legal issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to an injunction and security for outstanding payments, including applicable GST and interest, under various film-related agreements, pending arbitral proceedings.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 383/2026 Page 1 of 6 $~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010413612026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 383/2026 & I.A. 24173/2026 IVY ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Amit George, Mr. Dhiraj Mhetre, Ms. Shivani Sharma, Mr. Sanampreet Singh, Mr. Nikhil Singh and Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Advocates. versus PRINCE PICTURES & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pulkit Agarwal and Mr. Shubham, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R %

09.09.

2026

1.

This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the following prayers: “a. pass an order of injunction restraining the Respondent, its distributors, sub-distributors, licensees, assigns, agents, representatives and/or any person acting for or on its behalf from releasing, exhibiting, distributing, broadcasting, streaming, telecasting and/or otherwise commercially exploiting the cinematograph film titled “Sardar 2”, presently scheduled for theatrical release on September 10, 2026

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.