Welspring Universal vs. Additional Commissioner Of Central GST

W.P.(C)/11957/2025HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01055252202514 September 2026Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN23 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Kunal Sharma and Ms. Rishika Goyal, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Brijesh Yadav, SPC with Ms. Nikita, Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Mr. Sawan Saini, Mr. Anirudh Nagar, Mr. Atul Yadav & Mr. Kunal Chaudhary, Advs
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the impugned GST demand notice and order were unsustainable because they failed to consider the subsequent CESTAT order which had set aside the appellate order relied upon by the respondent. The Court found that the adjudicating authority could not proceed on the basis of an order that had already been nullified.

Facts

The petitioner sought to quash a GST demand notice and order, which were based on grounds that were subject to prior litigation. The prior litigation involved a refund order, an appeal against it, and a subsequent CESTAT order that upheld the petitioner's refund entitlement.

Key Issues

Whether a GST demand can be sustained when the basis for it has been overturned by a higher appellate authority in prior proceedings. Whether the adjudicating authority erred by relying on an order that was subsequently set aside.

Sections Cited

Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

W.P.(C) 11957/2025 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Judgment reserved on: 19.08.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 14.09.2026

Judgment uploaded on: 14.09.2026

# CNR No. DLHC010552522025 + W.P.(C) 11957/2025, CM APPL. 48790/2025 and CM APPL. 44034/2026

WELSPRING UNIVERSAL

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Sharma and Ms. Rishika Goyal, Advs.

versus

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GST .....Respondent Through: Mr. Brijesh Yadav, SPC with Ms. Nikita, Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Mr. Sawan Saini, Mr. Anirudh Nagar, Mr. Atul Yadav & Mr. Kunal Chaudhary, Advs.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN J U D G M E N T ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.:

1.

The issue which arises for consideration in the present Petition is whether the demand confirmed against the Petitioner pursuant to the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice dated 10.12.2019 can be sustained, Signed By:JAI NARAYAN Signing Date:14.09.2026 14:

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.