Alk Enterprise & Anr. vs. Rani Aggarwal & Ors.

CM(M)/1982/2026HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01042544202614 September 2026Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL5 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Akanksha Sisodia and Ms. Gorima Khakhlari, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Lalit Gupta, Mr. Priyansh Jain, Mr. I. Rashneet Singh and Mr. Anmol Ghai, Advs. along with respondents in person
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The High Court found that the petitioners had neither cleared admitted rent arrears nor vacated the property despite repeated opportunities, demonstrating a clear lack of bona fides. Consequently, the Court found no ground to intervene and dismissed the petition.

Facts

The petitioners, tenants, challenged a Trial Court order denying their request for a three-month extension to vacate a commercial property. They had repeatedly failed to pay admitted rent arrears, leading to their defence being struck off and a decree of possession being passed against them.

Key Issues

Whether the Trial Court erred in dismissing the petitioners' application for extension of time to vacate the suit property, and whether the petitioners' conduct warranted indulgence from the High Court despite their continuous failure to pay rent arrears and vacate.

Sections Cited

None (The judgment is primarily on civil procedure; while 'GST' is mentioned as part of the arrears to be paid, no specific CGST/SGST Act sections or rules were discussed or applied by the Court.)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010425442026 + CM(M) 1982/2026, CM APPL. 60984/2026, CM APPL. 60985/2026 & CM APPL. 60986/2026 ALK ENTERPRISE & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Akanksha Sisodia and Ms. Gorima Khakhlari, Advs. versus RANI AGGARWAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Lalit Gupta, Mr. Priyansh Jain, Mr. I. Rashneet Singh and Mr. Anmol Ghai, Advs. along with respondents in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL

O R D E R %

14.09.

2026

1.

Through the present petition, the petitioners/defendants are seeking to set aside the order dated 31.08.2026 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court)-06, South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi in CS (COMM) No.298/2025 titled “Rani Aggarwal & Ors. v. ALK Enterprises & Anr.” whereby the learned Trial Court dismissed the application of the petitioners seeking extension of time to vacate the suit property.

2.

Briefly stated, in 2025 the respondents/plaintiffs instituted the underlying commercial suit for recovery against the petitioners seeking possession of

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.