M/S. Sudhamayee Papers P LTD vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Tax
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the foll,rwing: JUDGMENT a THD HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN ORDER: Ms. K.Prabhabati, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Dominic Fernandes. learr-red Senior Standing Counscl for Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) appears for respondent No.I .
Petitioner has approached tl-ris Court against the Order-in-Original dated 13.12.2023 u'hereby tax, interest and penalty has been imposed upon it for two financiai years 2017-lB and 2018-19. Petitioner could not participate in the proceedings as there were major flre accident incidents on 18.06.2023, just two months before the issuance of the show cause notice on 31.08.2023. Petitiorrer has inter ofta taken the plea of lack of notice for personal hearings and inability to participate because of the major fire accident incidcnts in its premises. The impugned demand relates to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A for rer;onciliation of which no such WRIT PETITION No.29O95 of 2025
notice in ASIIIT 10 was issued upon scrutin] of its rcturns before initiation of proceedings. petitioncr is .rllou,ed liberty, it ma1' approtrcl-r the appellate ar.rtho;-itt to raisc all the grounds of 1au, in fact ar':ailable to it 4. l,earned Senior Sta-nding Counsel for CBIC tholrgh submits that the grounds on fact alleging lacl.: of sen'ice of notice of personal hearing or major fire accidcnt incidct-tts har,e bccn laken, rvhich can be controverted onlv trpon recr:ipt of instructions, :-rovvever if the petitioner is inr;lir-re'd to avzril tl'rc appeal remed.., this Court n'lay pass appropriate oi:der as rnay be deemed llt.
Ir-r thc .reculiar facts and circumstances; noted zrbor.e. since the petilioner is inclined to approach the appeliate lbrum. this Court s'ithout commenting on tire merits of the casc of the parties is inclined to grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority within period of ts'o s-eeks ri'ith statuton/ pre-deposit. In case the petitioner prefers such an appeal, the eLppellate authority would conside r r the casc, in 3. Learncd r:ounsel for the pelitioner submits that if accorda;rce u-rth larv
To, ,M
With these observations. the instar-rt Writ Petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous applications pending, il an_v, shall stand closed. S -M. JAWAHAR R ISTANT R RAR //// ECTION OFFICER .l . The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Nagol ST Division, l st Floor, 92, Co-operative Sai BalajiArcade, 2-3-908, Plot No. 183 and 184, Sy Bank Colony, Nagole Village, Uppal (Mandal), Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad - 500068. 2 The Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Union of lndia. 3rd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad fi/arg, New Delhi-1 10001
One CC to MS.K.PRABHABATI, Advocate. [OPUC]
One CC to SRI DOMINIC FERNANDES, Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC loPUCl
One CC to Deputy Solicitor General of lndia, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OPUC]
Two CD Copies. BSK rJ5
HIGH COURT DATED:2510912'.425 JUDGMENT WP.No.29095 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT CO{}TS 3 € o 1HL .r,. ( (f Jr) $nt 01 !lB\J 2l[i oE,spatctt sO ? C) I t2 ir, t')
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.