M/S. Ksr Infrastructure Projects vs. S Chahat Bajpai, Ias

CC/1348/2025HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01034336202516 April 2026Bench: K.LAKSHMAN5 pages
For Petitioner: Sri Lattupally AnandFor Respondent: Sri Pasham Mohith (Standing Counsel, Warangal Municipal Qorp)
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. KSR Infrastructure Projects, filed a Contempt Case (No. 1348 of 2025) alleging willful and deliberate disobedience of an order dated February 27, 2025, passed by the High Court in WP No. 5944 of 2025. The earlier order directed the respondents, the Commissioner and Superintending Engineer of Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation, to consider a representation dated December 20, 2024, submitted by the petitioner. The petitioner contended that the respondents had not complied with this order. The respondents, through their standing counsel, submitted that they had considered the representation, deducted labour cess, seigniorage, and GST, and paid an amount of Rs. 1,23,96,966/- to the petitioner via cheque dated July 31, 2025, which the petitioner had received.

Held

The Court held that the respondents had complied with the order under contempt. The reasoning was based on the submission by the respondents' counsel, on instructions, that the representation had been considered, deductions for labour cess, seigniorage, and GST were made, and a sum of Rs. 1,23,96,966/- was paid to the petitioner via cheque dated July 31, 2025. The petitioner had already received this amount, and a copy of the cheque and calculation sheet were produced. Therefore, the Court found no violation, let alone a willful and deliberate violation, of the order by the respondents. The Contempt Case was liable to be closed. No specific issue was left undecided.

Key Issues

1. Whether the respondents have willfully and deliberately disobeyed the order dated February 27, 2025, passed in WP No. 5944 of 2025, thereby committing contempt of court? (Question of fact and law, concerning compliance with a court order). Petitioner's contention: The respondents have failed to comply with the court's direction to consider their representation, constituting willful and deliberate violation of the order. Respondents' contention: The respondents have complied with the court's order by considering the petitioner's representation, making necessary deductions for labour cess, seigniorage, and GST, and issuing a payment of Rs. 1,23,96,966/- to the petitioner, which has been received. They submitted a cheque and calculation sheet as proof of compliance.

Sections Cited

GST

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
[ 3168 J IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1348 OF 2025 Contempt Case under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for the willful and deliberate disobedience of the order daled 27-0?.-2025 passed in WP No. 5944 o'f 2025. Between: M/s. KSR lnfrastructure Projects, A registered Partnership Firm, Rep. by its Managing Partner, K. Ravinder Reddy, H.No. 1-9-1239n2, 1st Floor, Sahakar Nagar, Hunter Road, Hanumakonda, Warangal. ...Petitioner AND 1. S Llhahat Bajpai, lAS, Commissioner, Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal. 2. K. Rajaiah, Superintending Engineer, Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Lattupally Anand Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Pasham Mohith (Standing Counsel Warangal Municipal Qorp)

----ffir'7 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STAI'E OF TELANGANA AT: HYDERABAD HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE No. 1348 OF 2025 Date:16-04-2026 Between: lWs KSR Infrastructure Project

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.